Taxon	Illustrator ⠉
	Rhynchostegium serrulatum	Patricia M. Eckel

Plants medium-sized to large, in loose tufts or extensive mats, deep green, light green, or whitish, brownish or paler green with age. Stems creeping, terete to subcomplanate-foliate, not julaceous, irregularly branched, branches terete, complanate, or subcomplanate-foliate; central strand present; pseudoparaphyllia acute or acuminate; axillary hairs of 3–7 cells, cells long, 3–6: 1. Stem-leaves erectopatent or erect, gradually reflexed from erect base, imbricate to somewhat spaced, broadly ovate or suborbicular to ovatelanceolate, flat to slightly concave, not or slightly plicate; base with decurrency absent after leaf detached; margins serrate to serrulate; apex acuminate or ± broadly acute; costa to 40–85% leaf length, moderate to somewhat stout, terminal abaxial spine present or absent; alar cells poorly differentiated, or short-rectangular, slightly enlarged, region inconspicuous; laminal cells linear, walls moderately thick; basal-cells somewhat shorter. Branch leaves similar, smaller, sometimes narrower. Sexual condition autoicous; perichaetial leaves abruptly contracted, acumen straight to reflexed. Seta redbrown, smooth. Capsule inclined to horizontal, redbrown to brown, oblong-cylindric, weakly curved; annulus separating; operculum rostrate; peristome xerocastique, perfect. Calyptra naked. Spores 9–16 µm.

Distribution

Nearly worldwide, tropical to north temperate regions, with a few boreal taxa

Discussion

Species 30–60 (2 in the flora).

Aquatic plants of Rhynchostegium were often segregated as the separate genus Platyhypnidium, placed in Amblystegiaceae by M. Fleischer (1900–1922[–1923], vol. 4) and V. F. Brotherus (1924–1925). The latter genus was subsequently accepted by many bryologists, although some authors (such as J. Podpěra 1954; N. Takaki 1956; H. Robinson 1962) included it in Rhynchostegium. Phylogenetic analyses by S. Huttunen and M. S. Ignatov (2010) found that aquatic species within Rhynchostegium originated several times, thus the acceptance here of Rhynchostegium in a broad sense. Robinson (1987) recognized the tropical species as distinct from the European R. confertum (Dickson) Schimper, the type species of the genus, and he segregated tropical taxa into Steerecleus. However, the broader analysis by Huttunen and Ignatov demonstrated that species with Steerecleus morphology are not monophyletic, so acceptance of this genus would cause severe splitting of Rhynchostegium and enormous nomenclatural problems. The North American species represent quite morphologically different lineages, Steerecleus and Platyhypnidium.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

Rhynchostegium aquaticum, Rhynchostegium serrulatum

Key

1	Plants terrestrial; leaf apices gradually acuminate.	Rhynchostegium serrulatum
1	Plants aquatic; leaf apices ± broadly acute.	Rhynchostegium aquaticum

"long" is not a number."broad" is not a number.